[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":113},["ShallowReactive",2],{"gamma-site":3,"gamma-categories":21,"site":77,"article-1157":83},{"site_key":4,"domain":5,"site_name":6,"theme":4,"language":7,"logo":8,"favicon":8,"default_og_image":9,"navigation":10,"seo":11,"analytics":16,"verification":17,"features":18},"news_gamma","qingfengnews.com","青锋","zh-CN","",null,[],{"home_title":12,"title_suffix":13,"default_robots":14,"home_description":15},"青锋｜综合资讯"," - 青锋","index,follow","青锋提供时事、娱乐、财经等综合资讯。",[],[],{"rss_enabled":19,"search_enabled":20,"sitemap_enabled":19},true,false,[22,28,33,38,43,48,53,58,63,68,72],{"id":23,"code":24,"name":25,"slug":24,"level":23,"parent_id":26,"sort":27},1,"breaking","即时",0,10,{"id":29,"code":30,"name":31,"slug":30,"level":23,"parent_id":26,"sort":32},2,"china","中国",20,{"id":34,"code":35,"name":36,"slug":35,"level":23,"parent_id":26,"sort":37},3,"world","国际",30,{"id":39,"code":40,"name":41,"slug":40,"level":23,"parent_id":26,"sort":42},4,"hongkong","港闻",40,{"id":44,"code":45,"name":46,"slug":45,"level":23,"parent_id":26,"sort":47},5,"entertainment","娱乐",50,{"id":49,"code":50,"name":51,"slug":50,"level":23,"parent_id":26,"sort":52},6,"finance","财经",60,{"id":54,"code":55,"name":56,"slug":55,"level":23,"parent_id":26,"sort":57},7,"sports","体育",70,{"id":59,"code":60,"name":61,"slug":60,"level":23,"parent_id":26,"sort":62},8,"lifestyle","生活",80,{"id":64,"code":65,"name":66,"slug":65,"level":23,"parent_id":26,"sort":67},9,"tech","科技",90,{"id":27,"code":69,"name":70,"slug":69,"level":23,"parent_id":26,"sort":71},"hot","热话",100,{"id":73,"code":74,"name":75,"slug":74,"level":23,"parent_id":26,"sort":76},11,"opinion","观点",110,{"site_key":4,"domain":5,"site_name":6,"theme":4,"language":7,"logo":8,"favicon":8,"default_og_image":9,"navigation":78,"seo":79,"analytics":80,"verification":81,"features":82},[],{"home_title":12,"title_suffix":13,"default_robots":14,"home_description":15},[],[],{"rss_enabled":19,"search_enabled":20,"sitemap_enabled":19},{"id":84,"site_key":4,"content_kind":85,"slug":86,"path":87,"title":88,"excerpt":89,"content_html":90,"featured_image":91,"images":92,"category":101,"tags":102,"topic":9,"related_articles":108,"seo":109,"published_at":112,"updated_at":112},1157,"news","shanghai-rental-dispute-court-ruling","\u002Farticle\u002Fshanghai-rental-dispute-court-ruling-1157\u002F","上海租客改造房屋引发纠纷｜法院判决：租客需赔偿修复费但驳回业主24万索赔","上海一起长达18年的房屋租赁纠纷案近日宣判，租客张先生因改造房屋结构被业主要求赔偿24万元。法院审理认定部分损坏属自然损耗，最终判决租客支付6万余元修复及空置损失费用，同时业主需退还押金。","\u003Cp>上海市长宁区人民法院近日审结一起房屋租赁合同纠纷案，涉及租客长达18年的房屋使用及改造问题。案件源于2006年签订的租赁合同，租客张先生在居住期间对房屋进行结构性改造，引发与业主刘女士的赔偿纠纷。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2>租赁合同与房屋改造争议\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>2006年6月，张先生与刘女士签订为期一年的房屋租赁合同，约定租客需按现状使用房屋，如需装修或变更设施需经业主同意，并在租期结束时恢复原状。租赁期间，张先生将房屋墙壁改为黄色，并将三房结构改造为四房。合约到期后，双方未续签，但张先生继续使用该房屋至2024年7月。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cfigure>\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Foss.articledatacenter.com\u002Fadc\u002Fmedia\u002F6c\u002Fadcimg_01kxmzq40cygaff4m8h7y9zjqz.jpg\" alt=\"房屋改造示意图\">\u003Cfigcaption>涉案房屋改造示意图（图源：案件材料）\u003C\u002Ffigcaption>\u003C\u002Ffigure>\u003Ch2>业主索赔24万遭部分驳回\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>房屋交接时，刘女士要求张先生恢复房屋原状，包括结构复原、墙面刷新、地板和灶台更换等，索赔修复费14万元及空置损失10万元。张先生则辩称改造已获业主同意，大部分损坏属自然损耗，仅承认办公椅造成的地板磨损。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cblockquote>\u003Cp>法院明确指出：\"若因承租人故意或疏忽造成损坏，应承担相应赔偿责任；但房屋自然损耗不应由承租人负责。\"\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Fblockquote>\u003Ch2>法院审理认定关键事实\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>经审理查明，张先生确实获得业主同意进行改造，但根据合同仍需在退租时恢复原状。关于损坏责任，\u003Cstrong>法院认定除租客自认的办公椅磨损外，业主未能证明其他损坏系人为造成\u003C\u002Fstrong>。双方均承认曾发现房屋漏水但未及时维修。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cfigure>\u003Cimg src=\"https:\u002F\u002Foss.articledatacenter.com\u002Fadc\u002Fmedia\u002F3e\u002Fadcimg_01kxmzq40f5gq2d44j6eb7dhj3.jpg\" alt=\"上海市长宁区人民法院外景\">\u003Cfigcaption>审理本案的长宁区人民法院（图源：百度地图）\u003C\u002Ffigcaption>\u003C\u002Ffigure>\u003Ch2>责任划分与最终判决\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>法院综合考虑房屋18年使用年限、自然损耗及双方过错程度，做出如下责任认定：\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>租客需承担结构改造恢复费用3万余元\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>因业主未尽减损义务，空置损失酌定为3万余元\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>业主需返还6600元房屋押金\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp>本案判决既维护了租赁合同的严肃性，也体现了对房屋正常损耗与人为损坏的区分原则，为类似长期租赁纠纷提供了司法参考。\u003C\u002Fp>","https:\u002F\u002Foss.articledatacenter.com\u002Fadc\u002Fmedia\u002F6c\u002Fadcimg_01kxmzq40cygaff4m8h7y9zjqz.jpg",[93,96,100],{"url":91,"oss_url":91,"asset_key":94,"source_url":95},"adcimg_01kxmzq40cygaff4m8h7y9zjqz","https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.hk01.com\u002Fdi\u002Fmedia\u002Fimages\u002Fdw\u002F20260716\u002F1154455760789311488281756.png\u002FzBT5lgu-jVRe6O8Lc39BUbLLn_CLEAmztgn-UswJ_lI",{"url":97,"oss_url":97,"asset_key":98,"source_url":99},"https:\u002F\u002Foss.articledatacenter.com\u002Fadc\u002Fmedia\u002F3e\u002Fadcimg_01kxmzq40f5gq2d44j6eb7dhj3.jpg","adcimg_01kxmzq40f5gq2d44j6eb7dhj3","https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.hk01.com\u002Fdi\u002Fmedia\u002Fimages\u002Fdw\u002F20260716\u002F1154453834722971648598632.png\u002FrwWN-gRCQMJYzBQuqcHpVq4JBaFAFrEq-wYxz_sGMc8",{"url":91,"oss_url":91,"asset_key":94,"source_url":95},{"id":29,"code":30,"name":31,"slug":30,"canonical_code":30},[103,104,105,106,107],"房屋租赁","民事纠纷","法院判决","上海新闻","合同法",[],{"title":110,"description":111,"robots":14,"canonical_path":87},"上海18年租房纠纷案判决｜法院驳回业主24万索赔认定自然损耗","上海长宁法院审理一起长达18年的房屋租赁纠纷，判决租客支付6万元修复及空置损失费用，同时明确房屋自然损耗与人为损坏的责任区分标准。","2026-07-16T16:45:10+08:00",1784218309746]